<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC sells advertising on BBCA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aid-renegade.com/2009/02/bbc-sells-advertising-on-bbca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aid-renegade.com/2009/02/bbc-sells-advertising-on-bbca/</link>
	<description>∞ Micro Donations &#38; Philanthropy ∞</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.aid-renegade.com/2009/02/bbc-sells-advertising-on-bbca/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aid-renegade.com/?p=207#comment-38</guid>
		<description>@Defiant. As you read my blog you know I want to see the end of the TV tax. These programs are already produced &amp; paid for by the UK audience for the UK first. 
Are you suggesting the advertising on BBCA only covers the cost of maintaining the BBCA channel itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Defiant. As you read my blog you know I want to see the end of the TV tax. These programs are already produced &amp; paid for by the UK audience for the UK first.<br />
Are you suggesting the advertising on BBCA only covers the cost of maintaining the BBCA channel itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defiant</title>
		<link>http://www.aid-renegade.com/2009/02/bbc-sells-advertising-on-bbca/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Defiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aid-renegade.com/?p=207#comment-36</guid>
		<description>The running costs of the channel itself and to pay for the programme to be shown as BBC Worldwide has paid the BBC for showing it like any other broadcaster would have to pay the BBC.

If you aren&#039;t happy with it then perhaps you should be supporting the end of the BBC TV Licence instead of trying to pass off the British paying for America&#039;s version too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The running costs of the channel itself and to pay for the programme to be shown as BBC Worldwide has paid the BBC for showing it like any other broadcaster would have to pay the BBC.</p>
<p>If you aren&#8217;t happy with it then perhaps you should be supporting the end of the BBC TV Licence instead of trying to pass off the British paying for America&#8217;s version too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

